Correspondence on The Use and Calibration of Design Standards for SHS Joints by J.A. Packer and Dr.
Date published

N/A

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Institution of Structural Engineers The Institution of Structural Engineers
Back to Previous

Correspondence on The Use and Calibration of Design Standards for SHS Joints by J.A. Packer and Dr.

Tag
Author
Date published
N/A
Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

The Structural Engineer
Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 68, Issue 10, 1990

Date published

N/A

Citation

The Structural Engineer, Volume 68, Issue 10, 1990

Price

Standard: £10 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Mr A. N. Beal (M)
(R. H. Thomason & Partners)
This paper is an interesting and valuable review of the current position on steel SHS
tube connection design. It is disturbing to learn that tubes are commonly undersized by
up to 6% in this country and 10% in the USA. It is even more disturbing to learn that
the IIW/Eurocode formulae on which British Steel has based its joint design guide ‘rely on a significant amount of over-run in the yield stress to achieve adequate safety levels’ and that British Steel’s recommended safe loads have been based on applying a safety factor of only 1.5 to these, rather than the 1.7 required by BS449.

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Opinion Issue 10

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Vibration Design and Testing of a Long-Span Lightweight Floor</h4>

Vibration Design and Testing of a Long-Span Lightweight Floor

A study is presented on vibrations of a long-span lightweight floor. The floor was analysed using various different methods to see whether it would have acceptable vibration characteristics in service. The vibration characteristics were then evaluated experimentally for the floor in its bare and finished states. The site evaluation included qualitative tests to assess human reaction to vibrations induced in the floor and quantitative tests to measure the characteristics of the floor. K.P. Osborne and B.R. Ellis

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Verulam</h4>

Verulam

Potential for catastrophe in building operations, and the question of professional responsibility In our column for 20 March, Peter Mawer posed a dilemma arising from the danger of successive piecemeal alterations to terraced properties, where the progressive removal of stabilising walls could be in danger of leading to structural instability. The professional duty of an engineer acting in relation to a particular part of the terrace could be a problem - how far should his responsibility extend? We have received a number of contributions on this interesting topic. Mr A. Aitken, from Glasgow, relates what has been his own reaction in a similar situation, taking account of his assessment of possible consequences: With regard to the item on professional duty inspired by Mr Mawer’s contribution, I should like to point out that, in practice (as opposed to hindsight), it is very difficult to decide what to do for the best. Verulam

Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Push Tests on Studs Welded Through Profiled Steel Sheeting</h4>

Push Tests on Studs Welded Through Profiled Steel Sheeting

Results are given of 35 push tests using through-deck welded studs, three types of profiled steel sheeting, and shot-fired pins, with normal density and lightweight concrete. Maximum resistances are compared with the predictions of draft BS 5950: ‘Part 3.1’, draft Eurocode 4, and two reduction formulae for the effects of rib geometry. J.T. Mottram and Professor R.P. Johnson

Price – £9.95